Liability for negligent mistatement case example


Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller and Partners Ltd [1963] UKHL 4
Hedley Byrne & Co, an advertising agent, was about to place some orders for advertising for its client (Easipower Ltd) on TV and in newspapers which Hedley Byrne would be personally liable for. Before going ahead with this, Hedley Byrne  asked its bank to contact the client’s bank for a credit reference.
Hedley Byrne relied on the bank reference and placed large orders – which they lost when Easipower went into liquidation. Whom could they sue?

1.       They could queue with the other creditors in Easipower’s liquidation
2.       They could sue the banks for negligence

They sued the bank and would have been successful against the bank. The court approved the dissent in the Candler case and established the tort of negligent misstatement
However, Hedley Byrne lost the case on a technicality – the bank was not liable because of an exclusion clause in the reference letter – but the case did established the principles of responsibility for negligent misstatement.

Negligence


The tort of negligence protects the person, property and economic interests from damage caused by another person not taking reasonable care.
Tort law provides legal remedies for damage caused by negligence. Negligence is the tort which now dominates modern tort law after the successful test case of Donoghue v Stevenson in 1932.

Suing for negligence

There are three prerequisites for an action in negligence:
1.       A duty of care – this is a duty owed by one person to another because of the relationship between them which might cause injury.
2.       Breach of the duty of care – in order for a breach to happen, one must first establish the standard of care
3.       Damage – a failure to fulfill the duty of care which results in actual damage to the person who the duty of cared was owed to. The damage must have been caused or contributed to by the breach of the duty of care.

Establishing a duty of care

To be liable for negligence to another person, a person must owe a legal duty of care to that other person. One explanation is that a “duty of care” means a duty to take reasonable care or to exercise reasonable skill.
Whether a duty of care exists in a particular situation is a question of law and not fact.

Duty of care arises from the following salient features:
1.       Reasonable Foreseeability
2.       Proximity – there must be a relation between two parties
3.       Reliance – the reliance on duty of care
4.       Compassion – charity and compassion does not create a duty of care
5.       Knowledge – the defendant knew of the risk
6.       Vulnerability of the victim – Was the victim able to protect himself?
7.       Control or power to stop injury – if a person who has power to direct or to control the actions of another person knows that there is a real risk of harm unless the direction is given with care, that person owes a duty to exercise the power with reasonable care for the other person’s safety.
8.       No policy reasons – there are no policy reasons to deny a duty of care

Tenancies, leases and licences


Tenancy

A tenancy is an interest in land under which the owner gives a tenant, usually in consideration of rent, the right to exclusive possession of the land for a limited period. The landlord retains legal ownership of the property while the tenant has exclusive possession of the property.

Lease

The lease is the document or agreement creating the tenancy. A lease is a contract and it creates an interest in land.

License

A licence given by the licensor only gives authority or permission to the licensee to be on the land. In contrast to a lease, a licence does not give the licensee an interest in the land, and the rights given by a licence are:
1.       Personal to the licensee
2.       Limited in use
3.       Not transferable or assignable to a third person, and
4.       Lack the proprietary element in the property as in a lease
Tenants have benefits like statutory protection against eviction, relief against forfeiture, proprietary interests as against third parties and assignability.

Types of Leases and tenancies

Fixed term tenancy or lease

This is usually written, and its duration for a fixed term must be certain or tied to definite events so that its duration is certain. A fixed term tenancy or lease can usually be terminated earlier by notice or by the happening of a specific event such as breach of the agreement, rents arrears or hardship.

Periodic tenancy

A periodic tenancy is usually verbal and continues from one period to the next when the tenant holds over with the landlord’s agreement.
Written residential leases usually provide for a periodic tenancy at the end of the fixed term tenancy if neither party terminates the lease. If the parties continue with a periodic tenancy, it is easier for them to change the conditions of the agreement and to end the tenancy, as either the tenant or the owner/landlord/agent can end the tenancy at any time if they give the agreed notice.

Tenancy at will or informal lease

There is a common law at will if no one person is in possession as a tenant with the owner’s consent, such as a tenant continuing in possession after the expiry of a lease for a fixed term. Legislation in some jurisdictions provides those informal leases are deemed to be tenancies coming to an end at the will of either party on one month’s notice.

Tenancy at sufferance

This tenancy arises by implication of law where the tenant, who has originally entered the land lawfully, remains in possession and pays rent after the lease ended without statutory authority and without the assent or dissent of the landlord.

Trademark Infringement Case Examples


Miller v Britt Allcroft (Thomas) LLC [2000] FCA 1724

The name of a toy shop called “The Thomas Shop” which sold only “Thomas the Tank Engine” merchandise infringed the rights of the corporate owners of the Thomas name. The proprietor was ordered to change the name of the shop. However, like any retailer, the proprietor was free to use logos and trademarks in the shop including the “Thomas” logos as this would not breach s120(2)(b).

Virgin Enterprises Ltd v Klapsas [2001] FCA 1502

Richard Branson’s Virgin Enterprises got an injunction for trade mark infringement by the unrelated “Virgin Car Rentals”.

Anheuser-Busch Inc v Budejovick Budvar, Narodni Podnik [2002] FCA 390

Company A (the registered proprietor of the trade marks “Budweiser” and “Bud”) stopped Company B (a Czech brewery) distributing in Australia its imported beer “Made and bottled in Budweis, Czechoslovakia” under the name “Budweiser Budvar”
This was trademark usage which was not an example of using one’s own name in good faith and the usage was not protected by s122. The word “Budweiser” had a secondary meaning or a reputation in Australia as the mark of the proprietor.

Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Toea Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1443

Louis Vuitton lost its trade mark infringement case against the owner and operator of the Carrara markets on the Gold Coast, who was actively discouraging stall holders from selling Vuitton counterfeit handbags, sscarves and wallets.
In contrast, in China in 2006, the Beijing People’s High Court held that the owner of the Silk Road Market in Beijing infringed Louis Vuitton’s trade marks by knowingly renting space to stallholders who were selling counterfeit goods.

Design


A design may qualify for legal protection under the Designs Act 2003 (Cth). Designs law protects the overall appearance of a product.
The Designs Act 2003 (Cth) provides for registration of designs, enforcement and dispute resolution procedures. It aims to encourage innovation by giving designers the exclusive right:
1.       to exploit their designs for a limited time, and
2.       to prevent competitors from free-riding on design innovations, by putting the world on notice of the monopoly right of the owner.
The Act provides a publicly available register of existing designs which helps:
1.       to make known the creative ideas of designers, and
2.       to stimulate further creative activity

Copyright


Copyright law gives legal protection to people who express ideas and information in writing, visual images, music and film.
Copyright is the exclusive right to reproduce, publish or perform an original literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work.
Copyright is held by the creator of the work and may be assigned to an assignee.
Copyright does not protect concepts, ideas, information, people’s faces and images, names, styles and technique, titles and slogans.
Copyright can exist in two categories of material in material form (s22):
1.       “works” made under the “sweat of the brow” doctrine
2.       Secondary works

The effects of copyright law

1.       There is no need to register either the creator or the original work to get copyright protection
2.       The copyright owner has exclusive property in its work and can therefore exploit it commercially
3.       The copyright owner can prevent unauthorized acts in relation to copyright work, and can seek compensation for any breach of copyright.

Patents


A patent is a temporary monopoly given by the government to the inventor for the exclusive use of and the right to sell the new invention in return for public disclosure in the patent application

The effects of patent law

Patent protection gives a strategy for the management of intellectual assets which gives security to stimulate research and development during the period of patent.
Patent law has the following effects:
1.       Patent law gives the owner legal protection in exchange for disclosing the invention in the patent application.
2.       The owner gets a temporary monopoly once a patent is registered, but this monopoly is only as good as the ability of the owner to defend the patent from being infringed.
3.       Lodging and registering a patent application and specification is expensive and is usually handled by a patent attorney.
4.       Somme owners choose not to apply for a patent so they will not have to disclose their invention and lose their competitive edge. Some with smaller, “incremental’ inventions, may instead apply for an innovation patent, which can be obtained quickly.

Patents and employment

The Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) provides that copyright of an employee usually vests in the employer, but in contrast, the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) does not provide that an invention developed by an employee would be owned by the employer. There may be an express or implied term in the contract of employment that the employee must assign patent rights to the employer.
Case Example: University of Western Australia v Gray [2009] FCAFC 116

Innovation patents

Innovation patents are “second tier” patents which provide eight-year protection for lower level inventions that are not sufficiently inventive to qualify for a standard patent (s68). They cannot be claimed for plants, animals and biological processes.
They are designed to provide an incentive to small to medium business and local industry to invest in innovation. They take away some of the financial and commercial risks involved in the research and development of a new invention, and they are a first step to commercializing a new idea.

Standard patents

Standard patents extend for 20 years from the date of the patent (s67). Pharmaceutical patents extend to 25 years.